Dialogue on Worldviews
Created by on 6/27/2016 8:47:26 PM

Dialogue Concerning One's Worldview

Screen Shot 2015-01-27 at 1.10.37 AM


The ability to think, dialogue and examine arguments and evidence within the context of worldview gives a tremendous edge, latitude and creativity to any discussion, academic or personal. It liberates and opens up the field of discussion rather than getting it trapped in a corner or dead end. What's the value of an intellectual tug-of-war between your opinion and mine? Contextualizing a friend’s various convictions can really help focus your discussion, and move it in a fruitful direction of mutual understanding. It is key that we be patient and listen to each other. We begin from a platform of agape: listen, show respect, try to understand, take responsibly for good discussion. Ask some important, provocative or tough questions as well. Analysis can lead to curiosity and pushing out the envelope of the typical campus dialogue.

Three Major Worldview Categories

Naturalism  Matter alone exists; no God exists; the belief in spiritual entities is superstition or myth, to be replaced by scientific knowledge. Examples of this ideology/religious view is Western secular humanism, Marxism, various forms of materialism. Science is the key source of knowledge. It can lead to Nihilism.

Pantheism  Spirit exists; all is God and God is all; Atman is Brahman (the individual soul longs to be united with the world soul); the material world is maya or illusion). Such views are now global but tend to emerge from India, China and Southeast Asia (e.g. Hinduism, Buddhism) 

Theism   Matter and spirit  co-exist; God is transcendent Creator of all that exists: God is separate from the world, but regularly engages with it; God communicates to the world and his supreme goodness grounds human morality. Theism includes Judaism, Christianity and Islam

While these descriptions are radical oversimplifications, they provide a helpful starting point for dialogue and growth in understanding other views. Naturalism believes the least about the world--most minimalist and mechanistic; Christian Theism believes in the most complexity to reality. See James Sire, The Universe Next Door: a worldview catalogue; Arthur Holmes, Contours of a Christian Worldview; Walsh & Keesmaat, Colossians Remixed. In our world, a whole gamut of positions, from the most militant atheism to the most orthodox traditional theisms are represented and defended somewhere in our society. We often move in and out of various worldviews carried by different groups and institutions all the time in the pluralistic West. Learning worldview language is an essential coping skill and can promote peace and mutual respect.

Dr. Dan Osmond, University of Toronto, School of Medicine: “Whether we realize it or not, all university people have some sort of a view according to which they select, organize and interpret knowledge. Similarly, their behaviour is governed by a moral code [or style] of their choosing. Such views and codes differ widely in their validity and content as well as the quality of the behaviour that they engender.” 

 Charles Taylor, Professor Emeritus Philosophy at McGill University (paraphrased): A worldview is a picture that holds us captive; it involves our overall take on human life and its cosmic surroundings. It is the background to our thinking, within whose terms it is carried on, but which is often largely unformulated, and to which we can frequently imagine no alternative. It includes aspects or features of the way experience and thought are shaped and cohere. It is something invisible which people inhabit and it gives shape to what they experience, feel, opine, and see. It is like a set of philosophical glasses. Depending on what worldview has taken us captive, we can either see the transcendent as a threat, a dangerous temptation, a distraction, or as an obstacle to our greatest good. Or we can read it as answering to our deepest craving, need, fulfillment of the good life.


Tests for a Good Worldview

a. Coherence: justified by internal coherence and coherence with one’s other knowledge and beliefs.

b. Empirical Openness: it is a conviction which maintains openness to new information rather than being based on a limited data base. It is self-critical and open to thoughtful questions from outside.

c. Personal Relevance: must be livable and fruitful sociologically, i.e. to promote the personal and common good.

d. Explains the Existence of other Worldviews: understands them and how they relate to one’s convictions rather than just being rejected out of hand as a system of thought without any truth-value. Other views are respected and not superficially written off or explained away. Each one has some insights into human nature or the world at large.

Important Note: Key books to assist in dialogue: E.F. Schumacher, A Guide for the Perplexed. (reductionism) James Sire, Why Believe Anything at All? (epistemology); John Stackhouse Jr., Need to Know (epistemology); the literature of Dostoyevski, such as The Brothers Karamozov as a point of entry to one’s worldview; Walker Percy (Lost in the Cosmos); Viktor Frankl (Man’s Search for Meaning); or Charles Taylor, (The Malaise of Modernity). Glenn Tinder The Political Meaning of Christianity. The movies Eat, Pray, Love and  The Life of Pi are worldview journeys which reached cult status for awhile.

     Some Questions to Explore a Person's Worldview

 Could you identify, diagram and define for me the framework of your present philosophical stance? What are your working assumptions? Who is your favourite thinker? Where do you position or locate yourself in the current plural world of convictions? What resonates with you? What influences have shaped this conviction?

Questions regarding its coherence, unity or consistency as a view of reality as per above.

Is your view open to the data of other people’s experience or do you have your mind made up? Do you maintain a closed or open stance? Agnostics are generally more open and less dogmatic than atheists.

Look for the person’s interpretive paradigm, the intellectual grid through which they sift ideas and issues (philosophical glasses). E.g. Marxism, feminism, scientific materialism, environmentalism, Nihilism, New Age, or some form of liberation. This reveals what Charles Taylor calls the hypergood or dominant valueIt is vital for you to understand this core dominating and controlling good in colleagues. When you discover this, handle it with appropriate care.

Ask the questions of the livability and relevance of their view: use the Pragmatic Life Test. How does it improve human life or solve human problems, promote more justice or hope, feed the poor, heal racial relations, help with global warming? Does it have power to promote the common good? How far can the assumptions be taken without promoting evil or destructive consequences?

Are you happy with your present views or are you shopping around for something new, more substantial or a better fit? People have emotions around their cherished beliefs, so tread carefully.

Is your worldview naive or deeply examined? (e.g. Is Richard Dawkins your expert source on religion?)

On what grounds have you ruled out the possibility of the supernatural or transcendent? Do you sense any conflict between Naturalism and science as such? (Alvin Plantinga)

Where do you see yourself moving philosophically at the moment? Are you sensing some doubts about your worldview?

One might even explore the need for a whole new human narrative (Jeremy Rifkin, The Empathic Civilization) beyond greed, violence, individualism, aggressive behaviour, biosphere devastation.

What is the explanatory power of your materialistic Naturalism?: David Bentley Hart The Experience of God: Being, Consciousness, Bliss; Thomas Nagel, Mind and Cosmos; Alvin Plantinga, Where the Conflict Really Lies.

What gives your life hope, meaning, strength and direction? Does the cynicism of many people bother you?

 For further dialogue on worldviews, see ubcgcu.org

More Discipling Rescources
Nov25 Mary's Epiphany of Transcendence
Published: Nov 25 2015


Epiphanies come in various forms, a great work of art, a full moon, or a beautiful sunset. But there can also be epiphanies of the heart that resonate deep wit...
Read More..
Jul21 Twin Heritages: Christ and University
Published: Jul 21 2015


Two Heritages: Christ and University a. What if we could harness the power, resources and critical skills of the research university for the growth and ...
Read More..
Jul14 Christ of the Indian Road
Published: Jul 14 2015


E. Stanley Jones.  Christ Of The Indian Road . New York: Abingdon Press, 1925. I don’t usually read a lot of books that are 90 years old, but this one w...
Read More..
Jul08 Boundless: What Global Expressions Of Faith Teach Us About Following Jesus
Published: Jul 08 2015


Bishop, Bryan. Boundless: What Global Expressions of Faith Teach Us About Following Jesus. Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 2015. Reviewed by Craig Kraft W...
Read More..
Jul08 How To Love Your Neighbor Without Being Weird – Amy Lively
Published: Jul 08 2015


Lively, Amy. How To Love Your Neighbor Without Being Weird . Minneapolis: Bethany House, 2015 Reviewed by Craig Kraft Lively has taken the Lord’s comma...
Read More..
Feb26 Dialogue on Jesus
Published: Feb 26 2015


There exist today in the minds of people many different versions of Jesus. Cultural interpretation is a key factor in this dialogue. Few would dispute that Je...
Read More..
Feb14 Dialogue in Language of the Good
Published: Feb 14 2015


How can we talk about morality these days in a civil, rational manner? Opinions can be strong and emotions can be close to the surface. Discussions can be qui...
Read More..
Feb12 Dialogue on Worldviews
Published: Feb 12 2015


The ability to think, dialogue and examine arguments and evidence within the context of worldview gives a tremendous edge, latitude and creativity to any disc...
Read More..
Feb08 Robust Evidence and Argument Have Currency
Published: Feb 08 2015


There is a strong heritage of evidence and good argument, a multivalent discourse, to establish the credibility and viability of the Christian faith. It is a ...
Read More..
Feb06 Building Bridges to Faith
Published: Feb 06 2015


Building Bridges : This is the beginning of a series on stimulating dialogue with friends and clleagues. It is clear that we need fresh approaches to asking s...
Read More..
Digging Deeper Workshop Digging Deeper Workshop
Published: Jan 13 2015


David Collins developed the Digging Deeper workshop to allow people to explore what it means to be a disciple of Jesus Christ. Are you content with who you ...
Read More..
Nov15 Mapping the Arenas of Discipleship in the 21st Century
Published: Nov 15 2014


This is part of the Discipleship Project within Outreach Canada, a think tank on future possibilities and opportunities within Canada. In this article, I try t...
Read More..
Oct21 Jesus is the Yes and Amen
Published: Oct 21 2014


In II Corinthians 1, the Apostle Paul writes that Jesus is the  Yes  and the  Amen  to it all. What does this mean? Below are some reflections from our UBC Gr...
Read More..
Jul30 The Power of One on One – Jim Stump
Published: Jul 30 2014


Jim Stump. The Power of One on One . 2014. Reviewed by Craig Kraft Jim Stump says that he won the job lottery when he became a full time mentor to college...
Read More..
Jul19 Nihilism and the Incarnation
Published: Jul 19 2014


This article is the concluding section of a 70 page article on Recovery from the Slumber of Nihilism. it draws heavily on the brilliant insights of Canada's pr...
Read More..